Madison v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Respondents/cross-appellants Daniel Madison, Beverly DuBois, and Dannielle Garner are convicted felons seeking reinstatement of their voting rights. *88Respondents challenge the constitutionality of Washington’s disenfranchisement scheme because it denies the right to vote to convicted felons who have not completed all of the terms of their sentences, including full payment of their legal financial obligations (LFOs).1 Respondents argue that the scheme violates the privileges and immunities clause of the Washington Constitution and the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. McCormickWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Terrence Johnson v. Phil BredesenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.