Legal Opinion

Frank v. Walker

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 29, 2014No. Case Nos. 11-CV-01128, 12-CV-00185PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge.

In May 2011, the Wisconsin Legislature passed 2011 Wisconsin Act 23 (“Act 23”), which requires Wisconsin residents to present a document including photo identification (“photo ID”) in order to vote. 2011 Wis. Sess. Laws 104 (codified as amended in scattered sections of Wis. Stat. Ch. 5 and 6).1 The plaintiffs in the two cases captioned above claim the law violates the Fourteenth Amendment and/or Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973.

In the Frank case, individuals who are eligible to vote in Wisconsin contend that Act 23 violates…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. League of Women Voters of North Carolina v. North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  2. Ruthelle Frank v. Scott WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Ohio State Conference of the National Ass'n v. HustedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. Milwaukee Branch of the NAACP v. Scott WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Ruthelle Frank v. Scott WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API