Legal Opinion

Hemans v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The only question involved is whether there is credible evidence to sustain the findings of the commission. It is well established that if there is such evidence, the findings will not be disturbed on appeal. Indrebo v. Industrial Comm. (1932), 209 Wis. 272, 243 N. W. 464.

After thorough examination of the record we are of the opinion that it contains ample credible evidence to support the finding that plaintiff was not performing services growing out of his employment at the time he received his injuries.

Plaintiff claimed he was road-testing the car to satisfy the customer that the carburetor…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Indrebo v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Dentice v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Molinaro v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Glodowski v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Rick v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Melli v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API