Melli v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinle, J.
The challenge here is to the commission’s findings that there was no causal connection between appellant’s injury and his claimed disability. The question presented for determination is whether there was credible evidence to sustain the findings of the commission.
The cause is controlled by principles as follows: Causal relation between an injury and disability presents a question of fact for the commission. Harnischfeger Corp. v. Industrial Comm. (1948), 253 Wis. 613, 34 N. W. (2d) 678. Where there is a difference of opinion between the medical experts as to the cause of an employee’s injury…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Molinaro v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Gallenberg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Hemans v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Fitz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Johnston v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Marx v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969