Peterkin v. Randolph Marketing Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
In this action a judgment was entered upon the verdict of a jury for $1,740.60 in favor of plaintiff, from which defendant appeals.
Plaintiff sues for himself and as assignee of one Whiting, both of whom were owners of orange groves upon which, in the fall of 1917, there were crops of fruit ready for market. Defendant was a corporation engaged in the marketing of such fruit. The claims of plaintiff and his assignor, as appears from the complaint, are that they delivered their fruit to defendant for shipment upon an agreement by the latter whereby it guaranteed a price, f. o. b. at Anaheim, of…
2Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Manuel v. Calistoga Vineyard Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Perkins v. Pacific Fruit ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Garber v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Garber v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962