Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 1959No. Civ. 23494PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Plaintiff Ramiro M. Rodriguez brought this suit against the city of Los Angeles and Marcus Meisel for damages for personal injuries. The jury returned a verdict against both defendants. The city of Los Angeles appeals from the judgment. Meisel did not appeal. The suit against the city was under the Public Liability Act. (Gov. Code, §§ 53050 and 53051.)
■ The accident occurred about 10:15 p.m. on November 11, 1956, in front of the corner house at Fourth Street and Brooks Avenue in Venice. Meisel owned the property, numbered 402 Brooks Avenue. Plaintiff lived at 412 Brooks Avenue, two…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Eastlick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Pittam v. City of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garber v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Whinery v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Jaques v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Klotz v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962