Legal Opinion
Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. v. Tassone
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 1977No. Civ. 49985PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLEMING, J.
—Plaintiff-respondent Raleigh Industries of America, Inc. (Raleigh) and defendant-appellant Tassone, competing creditors of defendant Meredith, sought to satisfy their claims by resort to the inventory, equipment, and fixtures of a now-defunct bicycle business operated by Meredith.
*695Meredith defaulted in the action, and Raleigh obtained judgment against him for $18,000. Thereafter in a nonjuiy trial between Raleigh and Tassone, the trial court found that a prior transfer of inventory to Tassone had violated the bulk transfer law (Cal. U. Com. Code, § 6101 ff.), and in February…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grover v. TindallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Lawrence Holzman v. L. H. J. Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Gray v. Giant Wholesale Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Turbinator, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- In Re SheplerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.