Legal Opinion
MacDonald v. Pinto
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 13, 2001No. AC 19669PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The plaintiff, Richard C. MacDonald, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Robert Pinto,1 in this breach of contract action. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) found that he failed to prove the existence of an oral contract for employment, a breach of that contract and damages, and (2) failed to determine the credibility of the witnesses. Because we determine that the court’s findings of fact are contrary to the admissions of the defendant, we reverse the judgment and remand the case for a new trial.
The court, in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Presidential Capital Corp. v. RealeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Isaac v. Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Keefe v. Norwalk Cove Marina, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- W. v. W.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Connecticut Hospital for the Insane v. Town of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Edmands v. Cuno, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Baron v. CULVER AND ASSOCIATES, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Orange Palladium, LLC v. ReadeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Sokoloski v. McCorisonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- New Britain General v. Mobley, No. Cv01-05102082 (Feb. 26, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.