Legal Opinion
Moreing v. Weber
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 5, 1906No. Civ. No. 121PublishedCited by 22 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBuckles, J.
This suit is founded on the contract set out in the complaint made and entered into August 10, 1903, between the plaintiff as contractor and the defendants and S. V. Ryland, Julia H. Weber, H. Multharf, Anna Luhrs, Carl Simon, James E. Kidd, Stockton Savings and Loan Society Bank, Carrie Orschler, and the city of Stockton, owners of real property, which contract is as follows:
“This agreement witnesseth: Whereas, the undersigned, owners of real property in the city of Stockton, California, fronting on Fremont street, between the east line of Center street and the west line of Edison street,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. PurvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Jackson v. Puget Sound Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Heppe v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Guerini Stone Co. v. P. J. Carlin Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Meredith v. RomanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Williams v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.