Legal Opinion

Hopper v. Clackamas County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1987No. LUBA 87-007; CA A44545PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioners appealed to LUBA from Clackamas County’s approval of the application of Grigory and Anna Anfilofieff to construct a second dwelling on their farm, which is located in an exclusive farm use (EFU) zone. Grigory and Anna reside in the existing dwelling. The proposed new dwelling is for their son Efrem, who, the application states, will “serve as fulltime manager of [the] berry operation” on the farm. The application was made and the approval was given pursuant to ORS 215.283(l)(e) and the corresponding provision of the county zoning ordinance. The statute permits as a use on EFU land:

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCaw Communications, Inc. v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Kenagy v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Nelson v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Waker Associates, Inc. v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Smith v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API