Legal Opinion

Smith v. Clackamas County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1992No. LUBA 89-156; CA A65307; SC S37571PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

Clackamas County denied petitioner’s request for permission to establish a nonfarm dwelling on seven acres zoned Exclusive Farm Use (EFU). The seven acres is part of petitioner’s 54-acre parcel so zoned but is separated from the remaining 47 acres by a county road. The 47 acres is planted in Christmas trees but the seven acres, a portion of which is wooded and steeply sloping, is not.

Clackamas County Zoning and Development Ordinance (ZDO) 402.05.A.4 permits a nonfarm dwelling on EFU land only if the dwelling:

“Is situated upon generally unsuitable land for the production of farm crops and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Byrd v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Foland v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Smith v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clark v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Friends of the Metolius v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Kenagy v. Benton CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. Force v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070651b (or.tax 12-11-2008)Oregon Tax Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API