Security Finance Co. v. Floyd
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
Appellant brought this suit against appellee, doing business under the name of Floyd & Son, to recover upon six notes, five of which were for $50 each and the other for $18.40.
It was agreed that appellant “purchased these notes for value before maturity and with no notice whatsoever of any defense that the defendant might have to them, except such notice, if any, as might be imputed to the plaintiff by law on account of the fact that some of the notes have perforated or rough edges.”
The notes originally were attached by perforated line to a contract signed by appel-lee, whereby he purchased…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Garlitz v. Runnels County Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
3Cited by8 opinions
- CIT Corporation v. PanacCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McLean v. PaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. CastilloDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1954
- W. C. Biggers & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- McPherson v. KeelingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.