W. C. Biggers & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Kaufman
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WILLSON, O. J.
(after stating the case' as above).
Testifying as a witness, each of the appellants said Nash was the agent of his firm to buy cotton in Kaufman county and as such was authorized to accept drafts drawn, on the firm by sellers of cotton and drafts “coming in through other banks” than appellee “with signed bills of lading attached or tickets representing the cotton.” Each testified further that in arranging with appellee to pay for cotton purchased for the firm by Nash he never said anything to appellee as to Nash’s authority, except to tell it that Nash was their “agent to buy…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Shattuck v. American Cement Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Becker v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Security Finance Co. v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Keystone Pipe & Supply Co. v. MilnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bankers Life Insurance Company of Nebraska v. Scurlock Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Dilling v. Nationsbank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Harrison v. MacGregorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Hunter Milling Co. v. SatterwhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.