Legal Opinion
Hancock, Talmadge v. HomEq Svc Corp
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 23, 2008No. 07-7076PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
The executors of Carolyn Hancock’s estate appeal the grant of summary judgment on their complaint alleging fraud and other illegal acts by appellees 1 in connection with a loan obtained by Carolyn Hancock in 1994. Because the complaint is barred by the statute of limitations, D.C.Code §§ 12-301(3), (8), 2 we affirm.
I
In 1994, Carolyn Hancock borrowed $55,000 from appellees, pledging as security her house in the District of Columbia where she lived with her two adult children, the executors of her estate and appellants here. At the time, she was…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Diamond v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Geico v. Valentine FetisoffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Ikossi v. Department of NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Hendel v. World Plan Executive CouncilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Florence Goldman v. August BequaiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Capitol Services Management v. Vesta CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Redding v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Moore v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.