Busby v. Capital One, N.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying the Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand; Granting The Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the court on the pro se plaintiffs motion to remand, or, in the alternative, for voluntary dismissal of her claim. The plaintiff initially alleged a variety of statutory and common law claims against the defendants in connection with a promissory note and deed of trust that was executed by the plaintiff in 1996. Earlier this year, the court dismissed all but one of the plaintiffs claims. The plaintiff now…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- ['Mizell v. Suntrust Bank']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Apton v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Witte v. General Nutrition CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Inst. for Truth in Mktg. v. Total Health Network Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.