Legal Opinion
Geico v. Valentine Fetisoff
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 20, 1992No. 91-7065PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.
HARRY T. EDWARDS, Circuit Judge:
In March 1990, a personal injury action arising out of an automobile accident was brought against appellee Valentine Feti-soff. The GEICO insurance company (“GEICO”), which insured Fetisoff, subsequently initiated a declaratory judgment action in the District Court, seeking to obtain a determination of its liability under the insurance policy it had issued to Feti-soff. The issue dividing GEICO and Feti-soff was the proper interpretation of the policy’s limitation of liability provision; GEICO…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Tomlinson v. SkolnikOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Fowler v. A & A Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. TichnellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Edward William Hull, A/K/A Edward Hull v. Eaton Corporation Edward William Hull Travelers Insurance Company v. Eaton CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Retail Holdings, N.V.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- APA Assessment Fee Litigation v. American Psychological Assoc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. HazardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Lemon v. KramerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.