State v. Rogers
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Joseph Rogers appeals from criminal judgments entered after he was found guilty of sexual assault and criminal trespass. We conclude there was insufficient evidence of a mental disease or defect to support a sexual assault conviction under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-07(1)(b). We reverse the criminal judgment based on the verdict of guilty to the charge of sexual assault and remand for dismissal of count two of the Information. We conclude the trial court did not err when it did not allow a lesser-included jury instruction on the criminal trespass charge. Therefore, we affirm the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. YinemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LambertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. DeutscherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. CoppageNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. AzureMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. FrieszNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Brady v. J.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.