Pruden v. Keemer
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMallard, C.J.
This action resolves itself into an action in trespass to try title; therefore, plaintiffs must allege and prove both title in themselves and trespass by defendants. 4 Strong, N. C. Index, Trespass to Try Title, § 1.
In their complaint plaintiffs allege fee simple title ownership of Lot No. 5 of the Jacob Pruden Estate Lands and trespass thereon by defendants; in their answer, defendants flatly deny these allegations.
Defendants’ denial of plaintiffs’ allegations of title and trespass places the burden on plaintiffs to establish each of these allegations. Day v. Godwin, 258 N.C. 465, 128 S.E.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- McDaris v. Breit Bar" T" CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Searcy v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Huffman v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Day v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harrell v. W. B. Lloyd Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Keller v. HennesseeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Brandenburg Land Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975