Legal Opinion

Searcy v. . Logan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1946PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

This is the paramount question on this appeal: Is the wording of the receipt, Exhibit 2, identified by plaintiff and offered in evidence by defendant, a sufficient memorandum of contract to sell and convey land to admit of parol evidence for purpose of identifying' the land ? The court below was of opinion that it is sufficient, and admitted parol evidence for that purpose. The ruling is in harmony with principle of law enunciated in long line of pertinent decisions of this Court.

This Court has uniformly recognized the principle that a deed conveying land, or a contract to sell or convey…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. North Carolina Self Help Corp. v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Hodges v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Stewart v. . CarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Dobson v. . WhisenhantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Brooks v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Powell v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Overton v. BoyceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API