Harrell v. W. B. Lloyd Construction Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals, having found that plaintiff’s evidence at trial was legally insufficient to support his quantum meruit claim against defendant, was correct in failing to overrule the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion for involuntary dismissal and in remanding the cause for a new trial. For the reasons stated hereafter, we affirm the Court of Appeals.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover for monies allegedly due for construction services performed for defendant. Plaintiff alleged that during the period of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Neely v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Cogdill v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Reid v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Booe v. ShadrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Environmental Landscape Design Specialist v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. TalfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
- Booe v. ShadrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.