Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Newsome

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 13, 2001No. 00-CV-115PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellants, Fred and Frances Grimes, appeal from a judgment granting possession of a leased house to appellee, Thelma Newsome. Appellants, as tenants under the lease, repeatedly failed to pay then-rent on time. As a result, Ms. Newsome, appellants’ landlord, served them with a “30 day notice to correct or vacate,” pursuant to D.C.Code § 45-2551(b) (1996). When appellants faded to cure their late payments of the rent within the thirty-day period, Ms. Newsome filed a complaint against Mr. and Mrs. Grimes in the Landlord and Tenant Branch of the Superior Court. In due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moody v. Winchester Management Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Ontell v. Capitol Hill E.W. Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Cormier v. McRaeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Pritch v. HenryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ward v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Lipscomb v. Raddatz Law Firm, P.L.L.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Wharf, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. Howard Town Center Developer, LLC v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  5. Russell v. Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API