Legal Opinion

Cormier v. McRae

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 12, 1992No. 90-CV-1012PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this landlord's action for possession of an apartment, the trial court granted summary judgment for the tenant-appellee. The tenant successfully argued that, although he had received a 30-day "notice to cure or vacate" pursuant to D.C. Code § 45-2551(b) (1990) (Rental Housing Act of 1985), the landlord-appellant had failed to comply with the further requirement of D.C. Code § 45-1402 (1990) that a notice "to quit" a month-to-month tenancy must be given, not merely 30 days in advance of termination, but at least 30 days before the end of a rental period and thus at least 30 days before the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Entrepreneur, Ltd. v. YasunaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Administrator of Veterans Affairs v. ValentineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Thompson v. Shoe World, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Jones v. Brawner Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Taylor v. Eureka Investment Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Redman v. POTOMAC PLACE ASSOCIATES, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Mullin v. N Street Follies Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Grimes v. NewsomeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Ayers v. LandowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Howard Town Center Developer, LLC v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API