Ontell v. Capitol Hill E.W. Ltd. Partnership
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Associate Judge:
This appeal raises the question whether a notice to quit commercial premises was ineffective because it was not written in Spanish as well as in English. We hold that because the commercial tenant suffered no prejudice, as he was conversant with English but not with Spanish, the failure to give the statutorily required notice in Spanish did not render the notice ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the order granting summary judgment for possession.
Appellant David J. Ontell was a tenant in a mixed-use building (“the building”) owned and managed by appellee Capitol Hill…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dimond v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Henrioulle v. Marin Ventures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
- E. P. Hinkel & Company, Inc. v. The Manhattan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- George Washington University v. WeintraubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Joyner v. Jonathan Woodner Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Abdelrhman v. AckermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In re M.M.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Belton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Columbus Properties, Inc. v. O'CONNELLDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Grimes v. NewsomeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.