Legal Opinion
Russell v. Department of Housing & Urban Development
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 26, 2003No. 02-CV-21PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Appellant (Russell) appeals from a judgment of possession entered in favor of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). He contends that the judgment was improper because HUD made no showing that it had attempted to *577serve him personally with a notice to quit, as required by D.C.Code § 42-3206 (2001) (formerly D.C.Code § 45-1406 (1981)), before posting and mailing the notice. The record before us bears out that contention; indeed, HUD acknowledges on appeal that there is no evidence that it attempted personal service, arguing instead — despite abundant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bingham v. Goldberg. Marchesano. Kohlman. Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Moody v. Winchester Management Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Jones v. Brawner Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Robert Lee Parrish v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Grimes v. NewsomeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Abdelrhman v. AckermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- In Re Soon KwonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Sun Secured Financing LLC v. ARCS Commercial Mortgage Co. LPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Sun Secured Financing LLC v. Arcs Commercial Mortgage Co., L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010