Legal Opinion

Stillman v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 3, 1991No. 9736; 9737PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court reversing the defendant board’s decision to grant a variance to the defendant homeowner, Nancy H. Morgan. Morgan sought a variance of coverage and setback regulations from the Redding zoning board of appeals (board) in order to build an addition onto her house. The plaintiff, who is an adjoining landowner, opposed this variance before the board, and took an appeal to the Superior Court after the variance was granted. The trial court held that the board did not have the authority to grant the variance and that Morgan failed to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Garibaldi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. Johnny Cake, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Dolan v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Belknap v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Zoning Board of Appeals v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Haines v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Giarrantano v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. Jersey v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF DERBYConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API