Legal Opinion
Zoning Board of Appeals v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 7, 1992No. 9738PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
The named defendant,1 the Wallingford planning and zoning commission (commission), appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal of, inter alios, the named plaintiff, the Walling-ford zoning board of appeals (board), and declaring invalid and unlawful an amendment to § 9.1.H.2 of the town of Wallingford zoning regulations. On appeal to this court, the commission claims that (1) the board was without standing to challenge the amendment because it was not an aggrieved party, (2) the trial court ignored relevant precedent in concluding that the amendment improperly…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Hall v. Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- DeMaria v. Enfield Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Cannavo Enterprises, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Steeneck v. University of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Cole v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Lewis v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Taff v. BettcherConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.