Giarrantano v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant Rodney Green, in AC 19519, and the defendant zoning board of appeals of the city of Norwich (board), in AC 19527, appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal of the plaintiff, Dick Giarrantano, from the board’s decision to grant variances to Green that would permit him to build a thirty-six unit hotel on his commercially zoned property. The trial court determined that the record did not support the board’s conclusion that a hardship existed. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bloom v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Smith v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Francini v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Norwood v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Jersey v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF DERBYConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Benedict v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Csc Montoya Ltd. v. Branford Planning, No. Cv 00-0443002 (Nov. 29, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.