Legal Opinion

Haines v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 3, 1991No. 9596PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of Oxford appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the plaintiffs’ appeal from the board’s denial of their variance application. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court (1) improperly based its decision on the defendant’s prior approval of a separate variance application filed by a different applicant pertaining to another parcel of land on the same road, (2) failed to review the entire record in order to find a basis for the board’s action, (3) ignored the issue of self-inflicted hardship, and (4) improperly placed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Schwartz v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Grillo v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Garibaldi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. Ward v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pike v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Santos v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. Charbonneau v. Zoning Board, New Fairfield, No. 31 09 39 (Mar. 12, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
  4. Colangelo v. Stratford Zon. Bd. of App., No. Cv 31 47 68 S (Jan. 30, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
  5. Delmonte v. Zoning Board of Appeals, No. Cv93 0133115 S (Jun. 20, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API