State v. Ritz Realty Corp.

Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendants1 appeal from the judgment rendered for the plaintiff, the state of Connecticut, and from the denial of the defendants’ motion to open the judgment of the trial court, which was rendered after a hearing in damages. They claim that the court abused its discretion in denying the motion.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiff commenced this action *546in four counts,3 seeking injunctive relief, restitution, civil penalties and other appropriate relief pursuant to the Connecticut…