Legal Opinion
Woolls v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 2005No. B177992PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Petitioner Paul Woolls (Woolls) seeks a writ of mandate to set aside respondent superior court’s order denying his petition to vacate an arbitration award obtained by real parties in interest Thomas C. Turner and Thomas Turner doing business as T&T Construction (collectively, Turner). Woolls moved to vacate the award on the ground the arbitration agreement failed to comply with Business and Professions Code section 7191.
Section 7191 requires arbitration provisions in contracts for work on residential property of one to four units to satisfy certain disclosure requirements,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Carbajal v. CWPSC, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hoover v. American Income Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Boyle v. CertainTeed Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Valencia v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- SWAB FINANCIAL v. E Trade SecuritiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.