Legal Opinion
Gunderson v. University of Alaska, Fairbanks
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1995No. S-6570PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Chief Justice.
This case arises out of a sole source contract issued by the University of Alaska, Fairbanks campus, (UAF) to Timothy Gun-derson, d/b/a Alaska Contract Motor Express (Gunderson). UAF cancelled the contract after Alaska Railroad Corporation (ARRC) filed a formal protest, asserting that the sole source contract violated state law. See AS 36.30.300 (providing that a sole source procurement may not be awarded if a reasonable alternative source exists). Gunderson then sued both UAF and ARRC under a variety of theories. On motion by ARRC, the superior court dismissed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fontenot v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Coll v. First American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
- Ranes & Shine, LLC v. MacDonald Miller Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Lockheed Information Management Systems Co. v. Maximus, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.