Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1930No. File No. 6840PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

Appellant seeks to set aside his conviction on the ground that the trial court erroneously disallowed his challenge to the panel from which the jury was selected which found him guilty of grand larceny. The written challenge interposed at the trial and before any juror was sworn was as follows:

“Comes now the defendant, H. Smith, and challenges the panel upon the ground and for the reason that in the selection of the jury there was a material departure from the forms prescribed by the laws of the State of South Dakota, all of which was prejudicial to the substantial rights of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Mapes v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. State v. MorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Jones v. WoodwarthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. ChristiansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. HelmerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Nebraska Electric Generation & Transmission Coop., Inc. v. MarkusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. HaneeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State v. CaldwellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API