State v. Haneey
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MISER, C.
Appellants were convicted of a robbery of a bank at Huron. This appeal is from the judgment and the order denying new trial. The errors assigned are: (1) The disallowance of the challenge to the panel; (2) twenty-six instances of alleged misconduct by the state’s attorney; (3) the refusal to give appellants’ version of an instruction on the maxim, falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus.
*192The disallowance of the challenge to the panel was not reversible error. In State v. Morse, 35 S. D. 18, 150 N. W. 293, Ann. Cas. 1918C, 570, this court construed what is now section 4936, R. C. 1919, to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WilcoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. TownleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Lindsay v. PettigrewSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. MorseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. SextonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LarkinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. O'CONNORSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Kostel v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RosalesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. PoppengaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.