Legal Opinion

Jones v. Woodwarth

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1910PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Edmunds County. Hon. Eyman T. Bouci-ier, Judge. Action by D. R. Jones against George Woodworth. From a judgment for plaintiff and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an appeal by' the defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and from the order denying á new trial. The action was instituted by the plaintiff to recover of the defendant damages for an alleged breach of a contract entered into by the defendant with the plaintiff for the purchase of ioo head of steers, which the defendant refused to accept.

The defendant by his answer admits that he entered into the contract alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, but denies each and every other allegation contained in the complaint. The defendant for a further defense alleges that it was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Ullman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Fornia v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Lamb v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Van Hunter v. Beckley Newspapers Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Flagstaff v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API