Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1926No. File No. 5918PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBFLB, J-
Defendant was indicted for misapplication of bank funds in violation of the provisions oi 'section 8991, Cod’e 1919; not having been held to answer before .the finding of the indictment, defendant, upon his arraignment and before plea; moved to quash and set aside the indictment upon the following grounds, among others: •
“That the grand jury purporting to find said indictment was not regularly constituted, in that the drawmg thereof was not had and the notice of the drawing was not given as provided by law.
“That the grand jury purporting to find said indictment was not a regularly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jones v. WoodwarthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. FellowsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. SerlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. PickusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- State v. HaneeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. AnderbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.