DeKeyser v. Thyssenkrupp Waupaca, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against their current or past employer, Defendant Thys senkrupp Waupaca, Inc. d/b/a Waupaca Foundry, Inc. (“Waupaca”), claiming they had been denied wages for hours worked over the preceding three-year period. One of the claims Plaintiffs have brought is a collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 as Amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. (“FLSA”). Plaintiffs claim that under the FLSA they are owed compensation for time spent “donning and doffing gear and equipment, showering, and walking…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Huskey v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2014
- Pietrzycki v. Heights Tower Serv., Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2017
- Pietrzycki v. Heights Tower Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Smith v. Family Video Movie Club, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.