Legal Opinion

Luper v. City of Wasilla

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 2009No. S-12880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Deborah Luper raises dogs on property she owns in the City of Wasilla. City ordinances applicable to her property prohibited keeping more than three dogs without a permit. When the city sued Luper to enforce its ordinance, she applied for a use permit for an eighteen-dog kennel. The city denied her permit application and she appealed. After consolidating her permit appeal with the city's enforeement action, the superior court denied her appeal and granted the city summary judgment in its enforcement action. We affirm. Because substantial evidence…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mann v. Calumet CityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Apline Energy, LLC v. Matanuska Electric AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Fink v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Frank Griswold v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Hussein Mann v. Calumet City, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API