Apline Energy, LLC v. Matanuska Electric Association
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOLGER, Justice,
I. INTRODUCTION
Federal law requires electric utilities to purchase power generated by cogeneration facilities that meet certain standards and provides a method of calculating the purchase rate that the utilities must pay: To qualify for this treatment, a facility must be certified that it meets the standards. It may self-certify, by filing a form describing the project and asserting that it believes it meets the standards, or it may, request a formal determination that it meets the standards. The Regulatory Commission of Alaska implements this certification scheme on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Summer Sagoonick v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
- Leahy v. ConantAlaska Supreme Court · 2019