Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Appeal of Admonition Regarding A.M.E.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1995No. C7-95-162PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

A panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board (LPRB) unanimously affirmed the admonition issued by the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility to A.M.E. for violations of Rules 4.4 and 8.4(d), Minn.R.Prof.Conduet (MRPC). We affirm the admonition only as it relates to the violation of Rule 8.4(d).

A.M.E. was admitted to the practice of law in Minnesota on May 15, 1985, and currently practices in St. Paul. On July 15, 1994, the buyer in a real estate transaction filed an ethics complaint against A.M.E., alleging that A.M.E. had acted as the seller’s agent…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of CartwrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re the Discipline of ScallenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against AitkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against WestbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ThedensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Robert D. STONEBURNER, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0105909Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API