Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Williams

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1987No. C8-85-2307PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

The Director’s petition for disciplinary action against respondent attorney James Malcolm Williams alleges three counts of professional misconduct: Count I, misbehavior occurring during the Sievert trial; 1 Count II, misconduct occurring during a pretrial deposition in the Sievert case; and Count III, disruptive conduct at a probable cause hearing before a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board. The referee, the Honorable William A. Johnson, found respondent’s conduct during the pretrial deposition merited a public reprimand and that respondent’s misconduct on the other two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against N.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. In Re VincentiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Polk v. State Bar of TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Clarence Thomas v. Tenneco Packaging Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AlisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API