In Re Disciplinary Action Against Williams
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
The Director’s petition for disciplinary action against respondent attorney James Malcolm Williams alleges three counts of professional misconduct: Count I, misbehavior occurring during the Sievert trial; 1 Count II, misconduct occurring during a pretrial deposition in the Sievert case; and Count III, disruptive conduct at a probable cause hearing before a panel of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board. The referee, the Honorable William A. Johnson, found respondent’s conduct during the pretrial deposition merited a public reprimand and that respondent’s misconduct on the other two…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Against N.P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- In Re VincentiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Polk v. State Bar of TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Clarence Thomas v. Tenneco Packaging Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- In re Disciplinary Action Against UlanowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AlisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.