Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McGraw v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1990No. 89-2179PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s appeal presents a single question: Does appellant’s departure from his employment at Kenworth, for reasons unrelated to his injury, preclude his receiving temporary total disability compensation over the period sought? For the reasons to follow, we find that it does.

The effect of the termination of a claimant’s employment on entitlement to temporary total compensation was first discussed in State, ex rel. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1985), 29 Ohio App. 3d 145, 29 OBR 162, 504 N.E. 2d 451. The court, in discussing the issue as it related to a claimant who had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ramirez v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Ashcraft v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Horne v. Great Lakes Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Thomas v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Baker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Baker v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API