Legal Opinion

Hardy v. . Dahl

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1936PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

The defendant held himself out as a non-drug-giving practitioner of that system or school for the healing of human diseases known as naturopathy. By virtue of section-6704 of the Consolidated Statutes the statutory provisions for the examination of applicants and the issuance of certificates for the practice of osteopathy were made to apply “to all other non-drug-giving practitioners except chiropractors (as to whom special statutes are applicable), by whatever name they are known or call themselves, or of whatever school they claim to be graduates or hold diplomas, and to anyone who holds…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. State v. Wilcox.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Brown v. ShyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Janssen v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Macon Railway & Light Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. District of Columbia v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. State v. . SmoakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Galloway Ex Rel. Parks v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API