Legal Opinion

State v. Hunter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1980No. 79PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

Defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence obtained pursuant to a warrantless search of his automobile. There is no merit in this assignment.

Prior to trial defendant filed a motion asking that all evidence, including a pistol, hard hat, key chain, knife, coat and some gloves, seized by police from his automobile be suppressed because his automobile was searched and the property was seized without a search warrant, in violation of his constitutional rights.

The court conducted a voir dire hearing on the motion at which investigating and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API