County of Los Angeles v. Kellogg
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
This case is here on an agreed statement of facts and was begun under the provisions of section 1138 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The facts, so far as it is necessary to state them, are as follows: Defendant was the public administrator of Los Angeles County for the term of four years ending January 5, 1903; he received as compensation for his services during said term, and no longer, two hundred and fifty dollars per month, being the salary provided by law to be paid to him as public administrator; during his said term as public administrator he was appointed administrator of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Rogers v. HoberleinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Frink v. Heirs of HedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In re Estate of PingreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Healy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cox v. SchnerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Brown v. RuffenachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Ramsay v. VanMeterIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Saltares v. KristovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Estate of McMillinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.