Frink v. Heirs of Hedrick
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Eiverside County settling an administrator’s account and from an order denying him extra compensation. J. S. Hoyes, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Appeal by the administrator from an order settling his final account and from an order denying him extra compensation.
1. Appellant was public administrator and became administrator of this estate by virtue of his office in the year 1893. He filed eight semi-annual returns as required by section 1736 of the Code of Civil Procedure—the first being “for the term commencing December 1, 1893, and ending June 1, 1894,” and the last being “for the term commencing June 1, 1897, and ending December 1, 1897.” These returns, as the statute calls them, do not appear in detail, but it is agreed…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- In Re Estate of BroomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Philbrook v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Estate of O'ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- County of Los Angeles v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.