Legal Opinion

Healy v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1900No. S.F. No. 2060PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PETITION for writ of review to annul orders of the Superior Court of Lassen County, fixing the bond of the public administrator, approving the same, and ordering the issuance of letters. F. A. Kelly, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an original application for a writ of review, wherein certain orders of the superior court sitting in probate in the matter of the estate of Matthew Healy, deceased, are sought to be annulled.

There had been a contest over the issuance of letters of administration in the estate of Matthew Healy between the nominee of certain heirs of the deceased and J. W. Hosselkus, public administrator of the county. As an outcome of the contest, the court made findings favorable to the contention of Hosselkus. It found, also, that the value of the personal property in the estate of the deceased, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Abrahams v. HosselkusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad v. BaileyNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Whittemore v. SeydelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. County of Los Angeles v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Earl v. BowenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Turner v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API