Legal Opinion

Saltares v. Kristovich

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1970No. Civ. 33586PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AISO, J.

Plaintiff Rodolfo Saltares, administrator of the estáte of Aníbal Saltares, deceased, (hereafter “plaintiff”) appeals from a judgment of dismissal entered upon an order sustaining without leave to amend the general demurrer of defendant, Baldo M. Kristovich, public administrator, as the administrator of the estate of Carmen Saltares, deceased, (hereafter “defendant” in the singular form) 1 interposed to plaintiff’s “Second Amended Complaint for Money Damages.” 2 We have concluded that the judgment should be affirmed.

The Demurrer

The gravamen of defendant’s demurrer is that the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Lipman v. Brisbane Elementary School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Loranger v. NadeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Blatty v. New York Times Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Val's Painting & Drywall, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Noble v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. B & P DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. City of SaratogaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Swinerton & Walberg Co. v. City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County Civic Center AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API