Legal Opinion
Genentech, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 29, 1989No. C-88-0889 MHPPublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Genentech, a pharmaceutical company, filed suit against Abbott Laboratories, another pharmaceutical company, seeking a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 that a recombinant product produced by plaintiff does not infringe patents issued to defendant. Abbott Laboratories filed a counterclaim asking for a judgment that its patents are valid and have been infringed, and sought damages for infringement.
The action now comes before the court on plaintiff’s motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15, to amend parts of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Frank Howey v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. Radio Corporation of America, Third-Party v. Universal Services, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Robinson v. Geo Licensing Co., LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Robillard v. Opal Labs, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Desert Protective Council v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.