Robillard v. Opal Labs, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge *966United States Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta issued Findings and Recommendation ("F & R") in this case on March 14, 2018. ECF 84. Judge Acosta recommended denying Plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint. Plaintiff objects to a portion of the F & R. For the reasons that follow, the F & R is adopted in part.
STANDARDS
A. Review of a Magistrate's Findings and Recommendation
Under the Federal Magistrates Act ("Act"), the Court may "accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- VIRGIN VALLEY WATER DIST. v. PARADISE CANYON, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2025
- Alires v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Ashlee Tanner v. Top Notch Transportation LLC, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Davis v. Walmart Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- De La Rosa v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.