Schock v. Penn Township Mutual Fire Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, J.,
This action in assumpsit was brought to recover $1,000 alleged to be due plaintiff from defendant on a policy of fire insurance. Defendant’s point for binding instructions for plaintiff in the sum of $550.76, with interest, was affirmed by the trial judge, and the jury returned a verdict accordingly. Plaintiff’s motion for judgment n.o.v. in the sum declared was overruled, and judgment was entered on the verdict. Plaintiff has appealed.
Plaintiff in his statement of claim alleged, inter alia, that on January 16, 1938, for the consideration named, defendant executed and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hay v. . Star Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- Palmer v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
- Overholt Et Ux. v. Reliance Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Burson v. Fire Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArmsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. SheffieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Borders v. Great Falls Yosemite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- George Washington University v. ScottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.